A rationale for employing mixed methods design in doctoral research about female students’ academic achievement in secondary schools in Papua New Guinea
Dinah R Dovona-Ope
Faculty of Education, University of Southern Queensland, Australia
PP: 59 - 67
Abstract
Contextual features and research problems are among some of the important factors that must be considered in making decisions about the most appropriate research design to employ in designing and undertaking doctoral research. In my doctoral research project, I was significantly influenced by a number of such issues in determining an appropriate research design. As the study focused on a problem confronting an under-represented group - female students - in a unique and complex context, mixed methods research design informed by the pragmatic and transformative-emancipatory theoretical positions (Creswell & Plano-Clark 2007; Mertens 2005a; Tashakkorri & Teddlie 2003) was considered as providing the most appropriate design for my doctoral research project.
Mixed methods research as a methodology was considered for its direct engagement in the complexity encountered by researchers in culturally diverse communities when work is focused on a social justice agenda (Creswell & Plano-Clark 2007; Mertens 2005a). It was also identified as embracing three underlying issues which were important to this study. These were: a focus on research outcomes through emphasis on the importance of the questions asked rather than the methods of data collection; a need to collect different voices from those living the experiences with an intention for advocacy; and a dedication to promoting social change as an outcome of the research.
As a research design, mixed methods research was considered for its ability to incorporate both quantitative and qualitative data collection techniques. Thus two highly structured numerical survey questionnaires for data collection and analysis were used with a larger sample (de Vaus 1995; Johnson & Christensen 2004). Additionally, two sets of interview schedules and focus group schedules were used for data collection and analysis with smaller samples. These were set up for refinement, extension and explanation of specific quantitative findings such as statistical relationships and differences among groups, or unexpected results in the participants' own words (Creswell 2002; Krueger 2000; Silverman 2006).
Keywords
mixed methods, research design, doctoral research, methodology
References
Chamdimba, P. C. (2003) Gender-related differences in working style during cooperative learning in secondary mathematics: A Malawian case study. In L. Burton (Ed.), Which way social justice in mathematics education? (pp. 153- 167) Westport, CN: Praeger Publishers.
Creswell, J. W. (2002) Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Creswell, J. W. (2005) Educational research. Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2007) Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
de Vaus, D. A. (1995) Surveys in social research. Melbourne, Vic: Allen & Unwin.
Flaherty, T. A. (1998) The women's voices in education: Identity and participation in a changing Papua New Guinea. Goroka, Papua New Guinea: Melanesian Institute.
Greene, J. C., & Caracelli, V. J. (Eds.) (1997) Advances in mixed methods evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2004) Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (2nd ed.) Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Kiluva-Ndunda, M. M. (2001) Women's agency and educational policy: The experiences of the women of Kilome, Kenya. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Krueger, R. A. (2000) Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Mertens, D. M. (2004) Research and evaluation in special education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Mertens, D. M. (2005a) Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Mertens, D. M. (2005b) Transformative prism: Resilience and social justice in mixed methods research. Retrieved January 9, 2007, from http://www.c4qi.org/qi2005/papers/mertens.pdf
Papua New Guinea National Department of Education. (1999) Education statistics of Papua New Guinea. Port Moresby: Corporate Data Branch.
Papua New Guinea National Department of Education. (2000) Education statistics of Papua New Guinea. Port Moresby: Corporate Data Branch.
Papua New Guinea National Department of Education. (2001) Education statistics of Papua New Guinea. Port Moresby: Corporate Data Branch.
Papua New Guinea National Department of Education. (2002) Education statistics of Papua New Guinea. Port Moresby: Corporate Data Branch.
Papua New Guinea National Department of Education. (2003) Education statistics of Papua New Guinea. Port Moresby: Corporate Data Branch.
Robins, J. (2005, November 18-20) Rhythm of school vital. Papua New Guinea Post Courier, 11.
Silverman, D. (2006) Interpreting qualitative data (3rd ed.) New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Tashakkorri, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998) Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Tashakkorri, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.) (2003) Handbook of mixed methods research in social and behavioural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Tawaiyole, P. (2004, July 21) The dilemma of subject choice. Papua New Guinea Post Courier, 11.
Webster, T. (2004, March 21) PNG girls run tribal gauntlet. Papua New Guinea Post Courier, 11.
eContent Home
