Student off-task behavior and motivation in the CALL classroom
Peter Gobel
Kyoto Sangyo University, Japan
PP: 4 - 18
Abstract
Recent research has suggested that the misuse of intelligent tutoring software is correlated with lower learning.
This article investigates the frequency and impact of different kinds of off-task behavior in three intact CALL classrooms using two intelligent tutoring systems (DynED and ALC) for English language learning. Thirty Japanese university students in each class were observed for four weeks to investigate whether off-task behavior had an effect on performance. It was found that students seemed to engage in far less misuse of the software than was hypothesized, but that off-task behavior was nevertheless strongly correlated with overall performance and post-test scores.
Further analysis suggests that two motivational factors (Attitude toward the Target Group and Perceived Usefulness of English) were good predictors of specific off-task behavior.
Keywords
tutoring software, online learning, computer-assisted language learning, CALL
References
Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. R. (2000) Limitations of student control: Do students know when they need help? Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 292-303.
Arbreton, A. (1993) Student goal orientation and help seeking strategy use. In S. A. Karabenick (Ed.), Strategic Help Seeking: Implications for Learning and Teaching. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Baker, R. S., Corbett, A. T., & Koedinger, K. R. (2004) Detecting student misuse of intelligent tutoring systems. Proceedings of the Seventh International Converence on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 531-540.
Baker, R. S., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Wagner, A. Z. (2004) Off-task behavior in the cognitive tutor classroom: When students 'game the system'. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2004: Computer Human Interaction, 383-390.
Beal, C. B., Qu, L., & Lee, H. (2006) Classifying learner engagement through integration of multiple data sources. American Association for Artificial Intelligence. Available on-line at http://www.aaal.org/
Carrol, J. (1963) A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64(8), 723-733.
Desmarais, L., Duquette, L., Renié, D., & Laurier, M. (1997) Evaluating learning and interaction in a multimedia environment. Computers and the Humanities, 31, 4, 327-349.
Din, F. (1996) Computer-assisted instruction, students' off-task behavior and their achievement. Education & Treatment of Children, 19(2), 170-183.
Eccles, J. (1983) Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75-146) San Francisco: Freeman.
Fischer, R. (2007) How do we know what students are actually doing? Monitoring students' behavior in CALL. CALL, 20, 5, 409-442.
Gardner, R. C., 1988. The socio-educational model of second-language learning: assumptions, findings, and issues. Language Learning 38, 101-126.
Heift, T. (2002) Learner control and error correction in ICALL: Browsers, peekers, and adamants. CALICO Journal, 19(2), 295-313.
Hubbard, P. (2004) Learner training for effective use of CALL. In S. Fotos & C. Browne (eds.) New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms (p. 45-67) New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Johns, J., & Woolf, B. (2006) A dynamic mixture model to detect student motivation and proficiency. American Association for Artificial Intelligence. Available on-line at http://www.aaal.org/
Karweit, N., & Slavin, R. E. (1982) Time-On-Task: Issues of timing, sampling and definition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(6), 844-851.
Knowles, L. (2004, August) The evolution of CALL. Language Magazine, 20-23.
Lee, S. W., Kelly, L, E., & Nyre, J. E, (1999) Preliminary report on the relation of students' on-task behavior with completion of school work. Psychological Reports, 84, 267-272.
Levy, M. (1997) Computer assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mori, S., & Gobel, P. (2006) Motivation and gender in Japanese EFL classroom. System, 34(2), 194-210.
Nelson, W., Bueno, K., & Huffstutler, S. (1999) If you build it, they will come. But how will they use it? Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32,3, 270-286.
16 International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 4(4), pp. 4-18. August 2008
Ryan, A. M., Patrick, H., & Shim, S. O. (2005) Differential profiles of students identified by their teacher as having avoidant appropriate, or dependent help-seeking tendencies in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 275-285.
Schofield, J. W. (1995) Computers and classroom culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sleeman, D., & Brown, J. S. (1982) Introduction: Intelligent tutoring systems. In D. Sleeman & J. S. Brown (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 1-11) New York: Academic Press.
Zimmerman, B., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986) Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 223, 614-628.
Tabachnick, G., & Fidell, S. (1996) Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.) New York: HarperCollins College.

eContent Home




